|
Details 2021-095
| 2 | 1. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** E002/M-20-86 Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy
In the Matter of the Petition for Approval of a General Time-Of-Use Service Tariff.
1. Should the Commission approve Xcel’s tariff changes as proposed in their February 23, 2024, petition filing?
2. Should the Commission approve Xcel’s recruitment plan modification as proposed in their June 20, 2024, petition filing? (PUC: Gomez) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2023-078
| 1 | 2. | | M - Miscellaneous | PULLED
** P5024/M-22-116 Global Tel*Link Corporation d/b/a ViaPath Technologies
In the Matter of the Global Tel*Link Revised Tariff No. 2 filing cancels and replaces, in its entirety, the current tariff on file with the Commission, Minnesota Tariff No. 1, issued by Global Tel*Link Corporation d/b/a ViaPath Technologies.
Should the Commission approve GTL’s December 30, 2022, revised and updated tariff as written? (PUC: Fournier) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2022-072
| 3 | 3. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** E002/M-21-695; Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy
E002/M-13-867
In the Matter of Xcel Energy’s Tariff Revisions Updating Community Solar Garden Tariff Providing Additional Customer Protections in Subscription Eligibility;
In the Matter of the Petition of Northern States Power Company, D/B/A Xcel Energy, for Approval of its Proposed Community Solar Garden Program.
1. Should the Commission approve Xcel Energy’s November 11, 2022, compliance filing?
2. Should the Commission modify Xcel Energy’s Standard Contract for Solar*Rewards Community tariff?
3. Should the Commission modify Xcel Energy’s Solar*Rewards Community tariff?
4. Should the Commission modify Xcel Energy’s Low-Income Energy Discount Rider tariff?
5. Should the Commission reopen Order Point 2B? (PUC: Duran, McShane) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2023-077
| 1 | 4. | | PPL - Petroleum Pipeline | ** IP7109/PPL-23-109 Magellan Pipeline Co., L.P.
In the Matter of the Application of Magellan Pipeline Co., L.P. for a Route Permit for the Pipestone Reroute Project in Pipestone County, Minnesota.
Should the Commission reconsider its October 22, 2024 Order Adopting Administrative Law Judge Report as Modified, Issuing Routing Permit, and Requiring Cultural and Archaeological Survey? (PUC: Ek)
The Commission has the authority to accept or decline a petition for reconsideration with or without a hearing or oral argument (Minnesota Rules 7829.3000, Subpart 6). In other words, a decision on a petition for reconsideration can be made without taking oral comments at the Commission meeting. | |
Action details
|