|
Details 2025-005
| 1 | 1. | | GR - General Rate | E111/GR-24-400 Dakota Electric Association
In the Matter of the Application of Dakota Electric Association for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in Minnesota.
Should Dakota Electric Association’s application be approved? (PUC: Ubani, Bonnett, DOC: Uphus, Lieb) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2025-256
| 1 | 2. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** G002/M-25-259 Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy
In the Matter of Xcel Energy’s Petition Requesting Reaffirmation of Affiliate Interest Arrangement Accounting Treatment.
Should the Commission approve Xcel Energy’s request for reaffirmation of affiliate interest arrangement accounting treatment? (PUC: Larson) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2025-004
| 1 | 3. | | M - Miscellaneous | * G002/M-23-518 Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy
In the Matter of Xcel Energy’s Natural Gas Innovation Plan.
Should the Commission approve Xcel’s compliance filing and allow it to proceed with its Sherco 5MW hydrogen electrolyzer pilot? (PUC: Nikitas) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2025-258
| 1 | 4. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** G002/M-25-403 Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy
In the Matter of the Application of Xcel Energy’s Petition for Approval of Gas State Energy Policy Rider Recovery with True-Up Mechanisms.
1. Should the Commission approve Xcel’s proposed SEP Rider Recovery to establish baseline for $46.3 million effective January 1, 2026, subject to true-up to actual 2026 expenses?
2. Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposed Capital True-up for 2026 through the existing SEP Rider?
3. Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposed Property Tax True-up for 2026 through the existing SEP Rider?
4. Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposed Labor Cost Recovery for 2026 through the existing SEP Rider?
5. Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposed Damage Prevention Recovery for 2026 through the existing SEP Rider?
6. Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposed Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) Costs for 2026 through the existing SEP rider?
7. Should the Commission approve Xcel’s request to leave its base rates unchanged in 2026 and to withdraw its application for a general rate incre | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2025-259
| 1 | 5. | | GR - General Rate | *** G002/GR-25-356; Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy
G002/MR-25-357
In the Matter of the Application of Xcel Energy for Authority to Increase Rates for Natural Gas Service in Minnesota;
In the Matter of a Petition by Xcel Energy for Approval of a New Base Cost of Gas.
1. Should the Commission accept the Offer of Settlement submitted by the Settling Parties?
2. Should the Commission adopt the recommendations in Administrative Law Judge’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation? If not, what level of revenue is appropriate for the Company’s 2026 test year? (PUC: Andringa, Larson, Pham) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2025-262
| 1 | 6. | | MR - Fuel Clause Adjustment /Refund | ** G002/MR-25-357 Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy
In the Matter of the Petition of Xcel Energy for Approval of a New Base Gas Cost for Interim Rates.
Should the Commission approve the proposed new base cost of gas? (PUC: Pham, Andringa) | |
Action details
|