|
Details 2016-188
| 2 | 1. | | WS - Wind Power Plant Siting | * IP6961/WS-16-686 Blazing Star Wind Farm, LLC
In the Matter of the Application of Blazing Star Wind Farm, LLC for a Site Permit for the up to 200 Megawatt Blazing Star Wind Project in Lincoln County, Minnesota.
What action should the Commission take on Mr. Ron Weverka’s Noise Complaint? (PUC: Ek) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2017-17
| 1 | 2. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** E015/M-12-233 Minnesota Power
In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s Compliance Report for its Temporary Rider for Residential Time-of-Day Rate for Participants of the Smart Grid Advanced Metering Infrastructure Pilot Project.
1. Should the Commission accept MP’s compliance report as complete?
2. Should the Commission direct MP to file a new Time of Day Rate? (PUC: Stalpes) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2017-23
| 1 | 3. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** E015/M-14-962 Minnesota Power
In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s 2015 Renewable Resources Rider and Factor.
Should the Commission grant the petition for reconsideration of its December 20, 2016 Order Determining Treatment of North Dakota Investment Tax Credits for Bison Wind Projects as requested by Minnesota Power? (PUC: Morrissey, Bender)
The Commission has the authority to accept or decline a petition for reconsideration with or without a hearing or oral argument. (Minnesota Rules 7829.3000, Subpart 6) In other words, a decision on a petition for reconsideration can be made without taking oral comments at the Commission meeting. | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2016-178
| 3 | 4. | | GP - Natural Gas Pipeline | * G002/GP-16-656 Xcel Energy
In the Matter of the Xcel Energy Request for Permit Amendment of the Black Dog Natural Gas Pipeline Route Permit.
Should the Commission grant the requested route permit amendment? (PUC: DeBleeckere) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2015-134
| 5 | 5. | | CN - Certificate of Need | ** PL9/CN-14-916; Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership
PL9/PPL-15-137;
PL9/C-20-801
In the Matter of the Application of Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership, for a Certificate of Need and Route Permit for the Proposed Line 3 Replacement Project in Minnesota from the North Dakota Border to the Wisconsin Border;
In the Matter of Honor the Earth’s October 27, 2020 Petition for Investigation and Complaint Concerning the Capacity of the Enbridge Mainline System.
Should the Commission reconsider its December 9, 2020 Order Denying Motion for Stay Pending Appeal? (PUC: Ek)
The Commission has the authority to accept or decline a petition for reconsideration with or without a hearing or oral argument (Minnesota Rules 7829.3000, Subpart 6) In other words, a decision on a petition for reconsideration can be made without taking oral comments at the Commission meeting. | |
Action details
|