|
Details 2016-173
| 1 | 1. | | PR - Periodic Reports | P999/PR-16-8 Local Exchange Companies;
Eligible Telecommunications Carriers
In the Matter of Annual Certifications related to Eligible Telecommunications Carriers’(ETCs) Use of the Federal Universal Service Support required pursuant to C.F.R. § 54.313.
Should the Commission adopt the Department’s revised list of petitioning ETC requests for high cost support certification to the FCC? (PUC: McCarthy) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2016-167
| 1 | 2. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** E002/M-16-420; Xcel Energy
E002/GR-15-826
In the Matter of the Petition of Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy for Approval of a Revised Competitive Response Rider Tariff and a Revised Competitive Response Rider Agreement with Gerdau Ameristeel US, Inc.
In the Matter of the Application of Northern States Power Company for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in the State of Minnesota.
Should the Commission approve Xcel Energy’s revised Competitive Market Rider Tariff and Competitive Market Rider Agreement (“Agreement”) with Gerdau Ameristeel US, Inc (“Gerdau”)?
Should the Commission exempt Gerdau from any interim rate increases proposed in Xcel’s pending rate case, Docket No. E-002/GR-15-826? (PUC: Kaml) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2016-168
| 1 | 3. | | M - Miscellaneous | * E017/M-16-507 Otter Tail Power Company
In the Matter of the Petition of Otter Tail Power Company for Approval of an Electric Service Agreement with Potlatch Land & Lumber LLC (PUC: Kaml; DOC: Zajicek) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2016-158
| 1 | 4. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** E015/M-16-564 Minnesota Power
In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s Revised Petition for a Competitive Rate for Energy-Intensive Trade-Exposed (EITE) Customers and an EITE Cost Recovery Rider.
Should the Commission Grant Minnesota Power’s Request to Extend the Termination Date of its Energy-Intensive Trade-Exposed (EITE) Rider? (PUC: O’Grady) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2016-159
| 1 | 5. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** E017/M-16-533 Otter Tail Power Company
In the Matter of a Petition by Otter Tail Power (OTP) for a Competitive Rate for Energy-Intensive Trade-Exposed (EITE) Customers and an EITE Cost Recovery Rider;
1. Should the Commission approve, modify, or reject Otter Tail Power’s proposed EITE Rate Rider pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 216B.1696?
2. Should the Commission approve, modify, or reject Otter Tail Power’s proposed EITE Cost Recovery Rider at this time or defer the matter to Otter Tail Power’s next general rate case? (PUC: O’Grady, Kaml) | |
Action details
|