|
Details 2026-083
| 1 | 1. | | M - Miscellaneous | * E015/M-25-433 Minnesota Power
In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s Petition for approval of its 2026 rate adjustment mechanism under its Rider for Transmission Cost Recovery.
Should the Commission approve Minnesota Power’s request of its 2026 rate adjustment mechanism under its Rider for Transmission Cost Recovery? (PUC: Willette) | |
Not available
|
|
Details 2025-052
| 2 | 2. | | RP - Resource Planning | ** E015/RP-25-127 Minnesota Power
In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s Application for?Approval of its 2025-2039 Integrated Resource Plan.
What action should the Commission take, if any, regarding LPI’s motion to compel Minnesota Power to provide responses to certain information requests? (PUC: Ricker) | |
Not available
|
|
Details 2024-018
| 2 | 3. | | RP - Resource Planning | * E002/RP-24-67 Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy
In the Matter of Northern States Power Company’s, d/b/a as Xcel Energy, Petition for Approval of Generator Projects for MISO ERAS 2 Projects.
1. Should the Commission approve the acquisition and construction of the Company’s proposed ERAS 2 projects?
2. Should the Commission approve Xcel’s proposed cost recovery approach? (PUC: Stalpes) | |
Not available
|
|
Details 2026-084
| 1 | 4. | | CN - Certificate of Need | ** E015/CN-25-111; Minnesota Power;
E015/TL-25-112 American Transmission Company, LLC
In the Matter of the Application of Minnesota Power and American Transmission Company, LLC for a Certificate of Need and Route Permit for the Iron Range - St. Louis County - Arrowhead 345 kV Transmission Project.
1. Should the Commission issue the draft route permit prepared by Public Utilities Commission Energy Infrastructure Permitting (PUC EIP) staff?
2. Should the Commission find that an Environmental Assessment addendum (EA) is required for the Project? And if so, should the Commission approve the scope of the EA addendum and Environmental Report (ER) recommended by PUC EIP staff?
3. Should the Commission refer the matter to the Court of Administrative Hearings (CAH) and request the appointment of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to preside over public hearings and prepare Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendations on the merits of the proposed route permit application and any necessary route permit conditions?
4. Should the Commission extend the 216I statutory timeline | |
Not available
|
|
Details 2025-191
| 2 | 5. | | CI - Commission Initiated Investigation | *** G999/CI-21-565 Northern States Power Co. db/a Xcel Energy;
Great Plains Natural Gas Co.;
CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp d/b/a
CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas;
Minnesota Energy Resources Corp.;
Greater Minnesota Gas, Inc.
In the Matter of a Commission Evaluation of Changes to Natural Gas Utility Regulatory and Policy Structures to Meet State Greenhouse Gas Reduction Goals.
What action(s), if any, should the Commission take to modify existing gas line extension policies for rate regulated gas utilities? (PUC: Dornfeld, Nikitas, MacCallum) | |
Not available
|