Details 2016-237
| 1 | 1. | | SA - Service Area | E275,134/SA-16-857 Moorhead Public Service Commission;
Red River Valley Cooperative Power Association
In the Matter of the Joint Request of Moorhead Public Service Commission and Red River Valley Cooperative Power Association to Modify Electric Service Territory Boundaries. (PUC: Fournier; DOC: Lusti) | |
Not available
|
Details 2016-236
| 1 | 2. | | SA - Service Area | E002,124/SA-16-701 Northern States Power Company, d/b/a Xcel Energy;
Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative
In the Matter of the Joint Request of Northern States Power Company, d/b/a Xcel Energy, and Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative for Approval of a Compensation and Orderly Transfer Agreement. (PUC: Fournier; DOC; Lusti) | |
Not available
|
Details 2016-234
| 1 | 3. | | M - Miscellaneous | * E002/M-16-811 Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy
In the Matter of Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy’s Petition for Approval of the Renewable Development Fund Annual Report, Tracker Account True-up, and Request for New 2017 Rate Rider Factor. (PUC: Mackenzie; DOC: Ouanes) | |
Not available
|
Details 2013-341
| 11 | 4. | | GR - General Rate | * G008/GR-13-316 CenterPoint Energy
In the Matter of an Application by CenterPoint Energy for Authority to Increase Natural Gas Rates in Minnesota.
Should the Commission accept CenterPoint’s annual revenue decoupling evaluation report for the period ended June 30, 2017, and approve CenterPoint’s revenue decoupling rate adjustments? (PUC: Alonso) | |
Not available
|
Details 2014-268
| 3 | 5. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** E002/M-14-761 Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy
In the Matter of Northern States Power Company’s Petition for Approval of the 2016-2018 Triennial Nuclear Decommissioning Accrual.
1. Should the Commission approve Xcel Energy’s annual compliance filing?
2. As a result of Xcel Energy’s third-party evaluation, should the Commission order any changes to the Nuclear Decommissioning Trust’s investment strategy? (PUC: Alonso) | |
Not available
|
Details 2016-155
| 3 | 6. | | AM - Alternative Miscellaneous | ** P421/AM-16-496; CenturyLink QC
P421/AM-16-547
In the Matter of the Petition of CenturyLink QC to be Regulated Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 237.025: Competitive Market Regulation (See Also Docket 16-547 for “Highly Sensitive Protected Data”);
Repository for “Highly Sensitive Protected Data” Subject to Additional Protection in Docket 16-496 (In the Matter of the Petition of CenturyLink QC to be Regulated Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 237.025: Competitive Market Regulation).
Should the Commission find that CenturyLink meets the Competitive Criteria of Minn. Stat. § 237.025 for each of the 109 Exchange Service Areas identified in its petition? (PUC: O’Grady) | |
Not available
|