|
Details 2017-187
| 1 | 1. | | PR - Periodic Reports | * P999/PR-17-8 Local Exchange Companies;
Eligible Telecommunications Carriers
In the Matter of Annual Certifications Related to Eligible Telecommunications Carriers' (ETCs) Use of the Federal Universal Service Support Required Pursuant to C.F.R. §54.313.
Should the Commission approve all petitioning ETCs' requests for high cost support certification? (PUC: McCarthy; DOC: Gullikson) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2015-329
| 3 | 2. | | GR - General Rate | E002/GR-15-826 Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy
In the Matter of the Application of Northern States Power Company for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in the State of Minnesota.
Should Xcel’s request to discontinue making compliance filings related to the Cold Weather Rule in this docket? (PUC: Alonso; DOC: Kundert) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2014-031
| 14 | 3. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** E002/M-13-867 Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy
In the Matter of the Petition of Xcel Energy for Approval of its Proposed Community Solar Garden Program.
Should the Commission reconsider its August 16, 2024 Order which denied the reconsideration of the its May 30, 2024 Order approving the Community Solar Garden Program Rate Transition Proposal with Modifications? (PUC: Brown-Huss)
The Commission has the authority to accept or decline a petition for reconsideration with or without a hearing or oral argument (Minnesota Rules 7829.3000, Subpart 6). In other words, a decision on a petition for reconsideration can be made without taking oral comments at the Commission meeting. | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2016-131
| 4 | 4. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** E002/M-13-867 Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy
In the Matter of the Petition of Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy for Approval of its Proposed Community Solar Garden Program
Was Xcel Energy’s Applicable Retail Rate (ARR) Compliance filing on July 31, 2024 properly filed by the process established in the July 22, 2022 Commission order? (PUC: Brown-Huss) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2015-349
| 2 | 5. | | CI - Commission Initiated Investigation | ** E999/CI-15-755 All Electric Utilities
In the Matter of a Commission Inquiry into Fees Charged on Qualifying Facilities.
Is it permissible under Minnesota statutes and rules to impose an additional monthly fee on a qualifying facility interconnected with a public utility?
If an additional fee is permissible, what factors should the Commission consider in determining whether the fee or charge is reasonable?
Should the Commission take any action on the specific fees charged by Minnesota Power, Otter Tail Power, and Xcel Energy? (PUC: Terwilliger, Rosier) | |
Action details
|