|
Details 2022-105
| 2 | 1. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** P558,6995/M-22-221; LTD Broadband;
P6995/M-21-133 Minnesota Rural Electric Association;
Minnesota Telecom Alliance
In the Matter of a Petition to Initiate a Proceeding to Revoke the Expanded Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (“ETC”) Designation of LTD Broadband, LLC (“LTD”) and Deny LTD’s Funding Certification for 2023.
1. Should the Commission lift the January 18, 2023, stay of this proceeding issued by the ALJ?
2. Should the Commission grant the MREA and MTA’s (Petitioners’) motion to suspend LTD’s Rural Digital Opportunity Fund ETC designation previously granted by the Commission? (PUC: Fournier, McShane) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2020-126
| 2 | 2. | | M - Miscellaneous | * E017/M-20-181 Otter Tail Power Company
In the Matter of Otter Tail Power Company’s Electric Vehicle Direct Current Fast Charging (DCFC) General Service - Time of Day Pilot Rates.
Should the Commission approve Otter Tail Power Company’s proposed modifications to the Time-of-Day Pilot rates for its Electric Vehicle Direct Fast Charging General Service? (PUC: Terwilliger; DOC: Bahn) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2014-031
| 31 | 3. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** E002/M-13-867 Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy
In the Matter of the Petition of Xcel Energy For Approval of its Proposed Community Solar Garden Program.
Should the Commission reconsider taking no action on the change to the definition of the Standard Bill Credit in section 9, revised sheet no. 69 of Xcel’s tariffs? (PUC: Strauss)
The Commission has the authority to accept or decline a petition for reconsideration with or without a hearing or oral argument (Minnesota Rules 7829.3000, Subpart 6). In other words, a decision on a petition for reconsideration can be made without taking oral comments at the Commission meeting. | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2023-166
| 1 | 4. | | CN - Certificate of Need | ** E002,E017,ET2,E015, Xcel Energy;
ET10/CN-22-538; Great River Energy;
E002,E017,ET2,E015, Minnesota Power;
ET10/TL-23-159 Otter Tail Power Company;
Western Minnesota Municipal Power Agency
In the Matter of the Application for a Certificate of Need for the Big Stone South-Alexandria-Big Oaks Transmission Project;
In the Matter of the Application for a Route Permit for the Alexandria to Big Oaks 345-kV Transmission Project in Central Minnesota.
1. Should the Commission accept the certificate of need application as substantially complete and authorize review using the Commission’s informal process or refer the matter to the Office of Administrative Hearings for contested case proceedings?
2. Should the Commission accept the route permit application as substantially complete and authorize review under the alternative permitting review process?
3. Should the Commission direct that the certificate of need and route permit applications be processed jointly (i.e., joint public information meetings, joint public hearings, and an environmental assessment in lieu of an enviro | |
Action details
|