Meeting Name: PUC Agenda Meeting Agenda status: Final
Meeting date/time: 9/12/2024 10:00 AM  
Meeting location:
Published agenda: Agenda Agenda Published minutes: Not available  
Meeting video:  
Attachments:
File #Ver.Agenda #NameTypeTitleActionAction Details
Details 2024-028 31. M - Miscellaneous** G008,002,011/CI- CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., d/b/a 23-117; CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas; G999/CI-21-565 Minnesota Energy Resources Corp.; Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy In the Matter of a Commission Investigation into Gas Utility Resource Planning; In the Matter of a Commission Evaluation of Changes to Natural Gas Utility Regulatory and Policy Structures to Meet State Greenhouse Gas Reduction Goals. What filing requirements should the Commission adopt for Xcel Energy, CenterPoint Energy, and Minnesota Energy Resource Corporation’s natural gas integrated resource plans (IRPs)? (PUC: Dornfeld)  Not available
Details 2023-149 32. GS - Power Plan Siting Non-wind** ET002/GS-23-217 Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy In the Matter of the Application of Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy for a Site permit for the up to 250 MW Sherco 3 Solar Energy Generating System in Sherburne County, Minnesota. Should the Commission reconsider its July 31, 2024 Order Approving and Issuing Site Permit? (PUC: Harvieux) The Commission has the authority to accept or decline a petition for reconsideration with or without a hearing or oral argument (Minnesota Rules 7829.3000, Subpart 6). In other words, a decision on a petition for reconsideration can be made without taking oral comments at the Commission meeting.  Not available
Details 2023-077 33. PPL - Petroleum Pipeline** IP7109/PPL-23-109 Magellan Pipeline Co., L.P. In the Matter of the Application of Magellan Pipeline Co., L.P. for a Route Permit for the Pipestone Reroute Project in Pipestone County, Minnesota. 1. Should the Commission adopt the administrative law judge’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation? 2. Should the Commission grant a pipeline route permit to Magellan Pipeline Co., L.P. for its proposed Pipestone Reroute Project? 3. If granted, which proposed route alternative best meets the route selection criteria in Minn. R. 7852.1900, and what, if any, conditions should be included in the route permit? (PUC: Ek)  Not available