|
Details 2013-239
| 1 | 1. | | TL - Transmission Line | * E002,ET2/TL-09-1056 Xcel Energy;
Great River Energy
In the Matter of the Application for a Route Permit for the Fargo to St. Cloud 345 kV Transmission Line Project.
Should the Commission authorize the minor alteration request? If the minor alteration is approved, should any conditions be required? (PUC: Ek) | |
Not available
|
|
Details 2013-240
| 1 | 2. | | TL - Transmission Line | * ET6675/TL-12-1337 ITC Midwest LLC
In the Matter of the Application of ITC Midwest LLC for a Route Permit for the Minnesota - Iowa 345 kV Transmission Line Project in Jackson, Martin, and Faribault Counties, Minnesota.
* Should the Commission authorize the minor alteration request?
* If the minor alteration is approved, should any conditions be required? (PUC: Ek) | |
Not available
|
|
Details 2013-241
| 1 | 3. | | RP - Resource Planning | * E015/RP-13-53 Minnesota Power
In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s 2013-2027 Integrated Resource Plan.
Should the Commission approve MP's 2013-2027 resource plan?
Should the Commission take any further actions in the resource plan? (PUC: Stalpes) | |
Not available
|
|
Details 2013-243
| 1 | 5. | | M - Miscellaneous | * E015/M-12-1348 Minnesota Power
In the Matter of Minnesota Power's Request for Approval of an Amended and Restated Electric Service Agreement Between Blandin Paper and Minnesota Power.
Should the Commission approve the proposed Agreement? (PUC: Fournier; DOC: Amit) NOTE: staff supports the recommendations of the Department of Commerce. | |
Not available
|
|
Details 2013-244
| 1 | 6. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** E015/M-11-712; Minnesota Power
E015/M-12-734;
E015/M-12-920
In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s Annual Filing in Compliance with Minn. Stat. § 216B.6851, subd. 5 Mercury Emissions Reduction Implementation;
In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s Annual Filing in Compliance with Minn. Stat. § 216B.6851, subd. 5 Mercury Emissions Reduction Implementation;
In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s Petition for approval of its Boswell Energy Center Unit 4 Environmental Retrofit Project and Boswell 4 Environmental Improvement Rider.
Should the Commission accept Minnesota Power’s filings in Dockets E015/M-11-712 and E015/M-12-734 and close the Dockets?
Should the Commission approve Minnesota Power’s mercury emission reduction plan for its Boswell Energy Center Unit 4 electric generating station (the “Project”)?
Should the Commission, in consultation with the Pollution Control Agency, order Minnesota Power to implement the most stringent mercury-control alternative proposed by the utility under Minn. Stat. §216B.6851?
Should the Commission approve Minnesota Power’s Boswell 4 Environmenta | |
Not available
|