Meeting Name: PUC Agenda Meeting Agenda status: Final
Meeting date/time: 7/10/2014 9:30 AM  
Meeting location: Large Hearing Room
Published agenda: Agenda Decisions Agenda Decisions Published minutes: Minutes Minutes  
Meeting video:  
Attachments: View Case Record CN-12-1235, View Case Record TL-12-1245, View Case Record R-13-24, View Case Record M-14-393, View Case Record AI-12-32, View Case Record AI-12-187, View Case Record AI-12-192, View Case Record AI-12-792, View Case Record AI-12-1157, View Case Record AI-13-787, View Case Record PA-13-788, View Case Record M-14-386, View Case Record M-14-255
File #Ver.Agenda #NameTypeTitleActionAction Details
Details 2013-321 21. TL - Transmission Line* ET2/CN-12-1235; Great River Energy ET2/TL-12-1245 In the Matter of the Application of Great River Energy for a Certificate of Need for a 115 kV Transmission Line Project in the Elko New Market and Cleary Lake Areas in Scott and Rice Counties, Minnesota; In the Matter of the Application of Great River Energy for a Route Permit for a 115 kV Transmission Line Project in the Elko New Market and Cleary Lake Areas in Scott and Rice Counties, Minnesota. Should the Commission adopt the Administrative Law Judge Report? Should the Commission find that the Environmental Assessment and the record created at the public hearing on this project adequately addresses the Scoping Decision of the Department of Commerce? Should the Commission grant a Certificate of Need for the proposed 115 Kv transmission line project? Should the Commission grant a Route Permit for the proposed 115 kV transmission line project? If approved, should the Commission include any additional permit conditions? (PUC: Ham)  Action details
Details 2013-143 12. R - Rulemaking* U999/R-13-24 All Utilities In the Matter of Possible Amendments to Rules Governing Utility Proceeding, Practice, and Procedure, Minnesota Rules Chapter 7829, Excluding Part 7829.2550, Which is Subject to a Separate Pending Rulemaking. Should the Commission Adopt Rule Revisions Recommended by the ALJ? (PUC: Moseng)  Action details
Details 2014-171 13. M - MiscellaneousE017/M-14-393 Otter Tail Power Company In the Matter of Otter Tail Power Company’s Request for a Variance to the Billing Error Rules. (PUC: Fournier; DOC: La Plante)  Action details
Details 2014-173 14. M - Miscellaneous* E.G001/AI-12-32; Interstate Power and Light Company E.G001/AI-12-187; E.G001/AI-12-192; E,G001/AI-12-792; E.G001/AI-12-1157; E.G001/AI-13-787; E.G001/PA-13-788 In the Matter of IPL's Petition for Approval of a Common Facilities Capacity Agreement with its Affiliate, Franklin County Wind, LLC; In the Matter of IPL's Petition for Approval of a Land Lease Agreement with its Affiliate, Franklin County Wind, LLC; In the Matter of IPL's Petition for Approval of a Local Balancing Authority Agreement with its Affiliate, Franklin County Wind, LLC; In the Matter of Interstate Power and Light Company's Transfer of Land Easements, Wind Rights, and Rights to Purchase Wind Turbines, to its Affiliate, Franklin County Wind, LLC; Interstate Power and Light's Petition for Approval of an Affiliated-lnterest Agreement with Franklin County Wind, LLC regarding a Services Agreement; Interstate Power and Light's Petition for Approval of an Affiliated-lnterest Agreement with Franklin County Wind, LLC regarding its Sale and Transfer of Land Easements, Wind Rights, and Rights to Purchase Wind Tur  Action details
Details 2014-172 15. M - Miscellaneous* PL6580,G002/M-14- Greater Minnesota Transmission, LLC; 386 Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy In the Matter of Greater Minnesota Transmission, LLC's Petition for Approval of a Firm Gas Transportation Agreement with Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy. Should the Commission approve the Firm Gas Transportation Agreement between Greater Minnesota Transmission, LLC and Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation d/b/a Xcel Energy? (PUC: Harding)  Action details
Details 2014-170 16. AM - Alternative Miscellaneous** P421/AM-14-255 CenturyLink, Inc. In the Matter of the Petition of CenturyLink, Inc. for Waiver of Minnesota Rule Part 7810.5800. Should the Commission grant CenturyLink's request for variance? (PUC: O’Grady)  Action details