|
Details 2015-031
| 1 | 1. | | SA - Service Area | * P999/SA-15-81 Minnesota Telecom Alliance
In the Matter of annual update of telephone exchange boundaries.
(PUC: Oberlander; DOC: Doyle) NOTE: Staff supports the Department recommendations to accept the boundary changes and authorize filing the changes with the FCC | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2015-038
| 1 | 2. | | M - Miscellaneous | * G011/M-13-669; Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation
G011/M-13-670
In the Matter of a Petition by Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation (MERC-Consolidated) for Approval of Changes in Contract Demand Entitlements for the 2013-2014 Heating Season Supply Plan Effective November 1, 2013;
In the Matter of a Petition by Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation (MERC-Northern Natural Gas (NNG)) for Approval of Changes in Contract Demand Entitlements for the 2013-2014 Heating Season Supply Plan Effective November 1, 2013.
Should the Commission approve MERC’s proposed demand entitlement capacity (levels) and cost changes to meet its Design Day and Reserve Margin requirements as described in the listed dockets, effective November 1, 2013? (PUC: Brill, Harding) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2013-341
| 8 | 3. | | GR - General Rate | * G008/GR-13-316 CenterPoint Energy
In the Matter of an Application by CenterPoint Energy for Authority to Increase Natural Gas Rates in Minnesota.
Should the Commission accept CenterPoint’s annual revenue decoupling evaluation report for the period ended June 30, 2017, and approve CenterPoint’s revenue decoupling rate adjustments? (PUC: Alonso) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2015-046
| 1 | 4. | | CN - Certificate of Need | ** ET2,E015/CN-14-787; Great River Energy;
ET2,E015/TL-14-797 Minnesota Power
In the Matter of the Joint Applications of Great River Energy and Minnesota Power for a Certificate of Need and a Route Permit for the Menahga Area 115 kV Transmission Line Project in Hubbard, Wadena and Becker Counties.
· Should the Commission find that the environmental assessment is adequate?
· Should the Commission adopt the applicants’ proposed findings and conclusions and also suggested permit revisions?
· Should the Commission grant a certificate of need for the Menahga Area 115 kV Transmission Line Project?
· Should the Commission issue a route permit identifying a specific route and permit conditions for the Menahga Area 115 kV Transmission Line Project? (PUC: Panait) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2015-039
| 1 | 5. | | TL - Transmission Line | * E015/TL-14-977 Minnesota Power
In the Matter of the Application of Minnesota Power for a Route Permit for the 16 Line Reroute Project in St. Louis County, Minnesota.
Should the Commission find that the environmental assessment and the record created at the public hearing adequately address the issues identified in the scoping decision? Should the Commission adopt the Administrative Law Judge Report? Should the Commission issue a route permit identifying a specific route and permit conditions for the 16 Line Reroute High Voltage Transmission Line Project? (PUC: Kaluzniak) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2015-030
| 1 | 6. | | WS - Wind Power Plant Siting | * IP6666/WS-08-208 Sibley Wind Substation, LLC
In the Matter of Sibley Wind Substations, LLC’s Site Permit for a 20 MW Large Wind Energy Conversion System in Sibley County.
Should the Commission revoke the LWECS Site Permit? Should the Commission take any other action? (PUC: DeBleeckere) | |
Action details
|