Meeting Name: PUC Agenda Meeting Agenda status: Final
Meeting date/time: 6/12/2015 9:30 AM  
Meeting location: Large Hearing Room
Published agenda: Agenda Decisions Agenda Decisions Published minutes: Minutes Minutes  
Meeting video:  
Attachments: View Case Record AI-15-50, View Case Record M-14-561, View Case Record M-14-651, View Case Record M-14-660, View Case Record M-14-661, View Case Record PA-14-664, View Case Record CI-02-2034, View Case Record M-12-383, View Case Record R-13-729
File #Ver.Agenda #NameTypeTitleActionAction Details
Details 2015-124 11. AI - Affiliated InterestG008/AI-15-50 CenterPoint Energy In the Matter of the Petition of CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas for Approval of a Change in Scope to its Master Service Agreement with CenterPoint Energy Services Inc. Should the Commission approve CenterPoint Energy’s request to change the scope of its agreement with CenterPoint Energy Services Inc. to include certain call center and related customer service and support functions previously provided by CenterPoint energy Minnesota Gas? (PUC: Bender; DOC: St. Pierre)  Action details
Details 2015-125 12. M - Miscellaneous* G008/M-14-561 CenterPoint Energy In the Matter of CenterPoint’s Request for a Change in Demand Units Effective November 1, 2014. Should the Commission approve CenterPoint’s proposed level of demand entitlement effective November 1, 2014? Should the Commission approve CenterPoint's proposed allocation of the fixed costs of two new storage contracts? Should the Commission grant CenterPoint a variance to Minn. Rules, Part 7825.2700, Subp. 5, to allow for a one-month delay in implementing rate case test year demand volumes? (PUC: Bender)  Action details
Details 2015-122 13. M - Miscellaneous* G022/M-14-651 Greater Minnesota Gas, Inc. In the Matter of Petition by Greater Minnesota Gas, Inc. for Approval by the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission for a Change in Contract Demand Entitlement Units Effective November 1, 2014. (PUC: Bender; DOC: Heinen) NOTE: Staff agrees with the recommendations contained in the Department’s April 1, 2015 Response Comments.  Action details
Details 2015-123 14. M - Miscellaneous* G011/M-14-660; Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation G011/M-14-661 In the Matter of a Petition by Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation (MERC-Northern Natural Gas (NNG)) for Approval of Changes in Contract Demand Entitlements for the 2014-2015 Heating Season Supply Plan effective November 1, 2014; In the Matter of a Petition by Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation (MERC-Consolidated) for Approval of Changes in Contract Demand Entitlements for the 2014-2015 Heating Season Supply Plan effective November 1, 2014. Should the Commission approve MERC’s proposed demand entitlement capacity (levels) and cost changes to meet its Design Day and Reserve Margin requirements as described in the listed dockets, effective November 1, 2014? (PUC: Brill, Harding)  Action details
Details 2015-019 25. PA - Property Acquisition** G011/PA-14-664 Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation (“MERC” or the “Company”) In the Matter of a Request for Approval of the Merger Agreement between Integrys Energy Group, Inc. and Wisconsin Energy Corporation. Does the proposed transaction require approval by the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission under §216B.50? Is a contested case proceeding appropriate? Should the Commission request additional information? Is the proposed sale consistent with the public interest? Should the Commission approve the proposed sale? If so, should the approval be with conditions?(PUC: Kaml, Alonso, Bender, Twite)  Action details
13-114 26. M - Miscellaneous** E,G002/CI-02-2034; Northern States Power Company, dba Xcel Energy E,G002/M-12-383 In the Matter of the Petition of Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy for Approval of Amendments to its Natural Gas and Electric Service Quality Tariffs Originally Established in Docket No. E,G-02/CI-02-2034 and Investigation and Audit of Service Quality Reporting-Fraudwise Report. 1. Should the Commission find that 129 complaints submitted to the Commission’s Consumer Affairs Office be counted in the customer complaints metric in Xcel Energy’s Quality of Service Plan tariff? 2. Should the issue of complaints about Xcel’s compliance with the MN DIP be filed and addressed in another docket? (PUC: McShane, Rosier)  Action details
Details 2013-365 37. R - Rulemaking* E999/R-13-729 All Electric In the Matter of Possible Amendments to Rules Governing Cogeneration and Small Power Production, Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7835. Whether to adopt the attached proposed rules as published in the State Register. (PUC: Kahlert)  Action details