|
Details 2015-263
| 1 | 1. | | SA - Service Area | E002,148/SA-15-655 Northern States Power Company;
Wright Hennepin Electric Cooperative Association
In the Matter of a Joint Request for Approval of a Service Territory Orderly Transfer Agreement between Northern States Power Company and Wright Hennepin Electric Cooperative Association. (PUC: Fournier; DOC: Lusti) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2015-264
| 1 | 2. | | M - Miscellaneous | E111/M-15-651 Dakota Electric Association
In the Matter of a Petition by Dakota Electric Association to Implement a Solar Option for Wellspring. (PUC: Bahn; DOC: Zajicek) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2015-266
| 1 | 3. | | M - Miscellaneous | * P6845/M-15-691 Southwest Minnesota Broadband Services
In the Matter of a Petition of Southwest Minnesota Broadband Services for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier.
Should the Commission approve Southwest Minnesota Broadband Service's Petition for ETC designation in Minnesota for the limited purpose of providing local services under the federal Lifeline program? (PUC: McCarthy) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2015-267
| 1 | 4. | | PA - Property Acquisition | * P5615,6716/PA-15-653 Charter Communications, Inc.;
Charter Fiberlink CCO, LLC;
Charter Fiberlink CC VIII, LLC;
Charter Advanced Services (MN), LLC;
Charter Advanced Services VIII (MN), LLC
In the Matter of the Notification by Charter Communications, Inc., Charter Fiberlink CCO, LLC, Charter Fiberlink CC VIII, LLC, Charter Advanced Services (MN), LLC, and Charter Advanced Services VIII (MN), LLC of Corporate Reorganization. (PUC: O’Grady; DOC: Linscheid) NOTE: Staff supports the Department’s recommendation to close the docket. | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2014-289
| 3 | 5. | | C - Complaint | ** P6716,5615/C-l4-383 Charter Fiberlink CCO, LLC;
Charter Fiberlink CC VIII;
Charter Advanced Services (MN), LLC;
Charter Advanced Services VIII (MN), LLC
In the Matter of the Complaint by the Minnesota Department of Commerce (DOC) against the Charter Affiliates regarding Transfer of Customers.
1. Should the Commission reconsider or reopen its July 28th Order?
2. If so, should the July 28th Order be modified? (PUC: O’Grady)
Please Note: Minn. Rules 7829.3000, subp. 6, states that "[t]he commission shall decide a petition for rehearing, amendment, vacation, reconsideration, or reargument with or without a hearing or oral argument. The commission may vacate or stay the order, or part of the order, that is the subject of the petition, pending action on the petition.” | |
Action details
|