Meeting Name: PUC Agenda Meeting Agenda status: Final
Meeting date/time: 12/8/2016 9:30 AM  
Meeting location: Large Hearing Room
Published agenda: Agenda Decisions Agenda Decisions Published minutes: Minutes Minutes  
Meeting video:  
Attachments: View Case Record GR 15-879, View Case Record MR 16-834, View Case Record M 16-494, View Case Record M 15-891
File #Ver.Agenda #NameTypeTitleActionAction Details
Details 2016-223 11. GR - General RateG004/GR-15-879; Great Plains Natural Gas Company, G004/MR-16-834 a Division of MDU Resources Group, Inc. In the Matter of the Application of Great Plains Natural Gas Company, a Division of MDU Resources Group, Inc., for Authority to Increase Natural Gas Rates in Minnesota; In the Matter of the Petition by Great Plains Natural Gas Co., a Division of MDU Resources Group, Inc. to Establish a New Base Cost of Gas in Compliance with the September 6, 2016 Commission Order in the General Rate Case. (PUC: Brill; DOC: Heinen)  Action details
Details 2016-214 12. M - Miscellaneous* G022/M-16-494 Greater Minnesota Gas, Inc. (GMG) In the Matter of GMG’s Request for Conservation Improvement Program Cost Recovery. Should the Commission allow GMG to implement a Conservation Improvement Program cost recovery rider and an annual Conservation Cost Recovery Adjustment (CCRA)? Should the Commission approve an initial CCRA of $0.18/dekatherm, effective January 1, 2017? (PUC: Bender)  Action details
Details 2016-208 13. M - Miscellaneous** E002/M-15-891 Northern States Power Company, d/b/a Xcel Energy In the Matter of the Petition of Xcel Energy for Approval of a Modification to its Transmission Cost Recovery (TCR) Tariff, 2016 TCR Rate Factors, and 2015 True-up and Compliance Filing. Should the Commission approve Xcel Energy’s request to modify its TCR Tariff, update its 2016 TCR rate factors and allow a true-up in the TCR rider for 2015? Should Accumulated Deferred Income Tax (ADIT) balances be prorated or non-prorated when the Company forecasts its test year for rate base. And, if the Commission decides proration of the ADIT balances is required, must the true-up also be calculated using the proration method when adjusting for actual ADIT? (PUC: Schwieger, Morrissey)  Action details