Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
Meeting Name: PUC Agenda Meeting Agenda status: Final
Meeting date/time: 9/21/2017 9:30 AM  
Meeting location: Large Hearing Room
Published agenda: Agenda Decisions Agenda Decisions Published minutes: Minutes Minutes  
Meeting video:  
Attachments:
File #Ver.Agenda #NameTypeTitleActionAction Details
Details 2017-187 11. PR - Periodic Reports* P999/PR-17-8 Local Exchange Companies; Eligible Telecommunications Carriers In the Matter of Annual Certifications Related to Eligible Telecommunications Carriers' (ETCs) Use of the Federal Universal Service Support Required Pursuant to C.F.R. §54.313. Should the Commission approve all petitioning ETCs' requests for high cost support certification? (PUC: McCarthy; DOC: Gullikson)  Action details
Details 2015-329 32. GR - General RateE002/GR-15-826 Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy In the Matter of the Application of Northern States Power Company for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in the State of Minnesota. Should Xcel’s request to discontinue making compliance filings related to the Cold Weather Rule in this docket? (PUC: Alonso; DOC: Kundert)  Action details
Details 2014-031 143. M - Miscellaneous** E002/M-13-867 Xcel Energy In the Matter of a Petition by Northern States Power Company, dba Xcel Energy, for Approval of its Community Solar Garden Program. Should the Commission approve the modifications to the applicable retail rate (ARR) calculation as proposed by Xcel Energy in its February 1, 2023 Compliance Filing and Fresh Energy in their March 30, 2023 comments for the 2023 ARR? (PUC: Strauss, Mezic)  Action details
Details 2016-131 44. M - Miscellaneous** E002/M-13-867 Xcel Energy In the Matter of a Petition for Approval of Northern States Power Company, dba Xcel Energy, for Approval of its Community Solar Garden Program. Should the Commission extend the residential adder for the 2023 value of solar (VOS) vintage? (PUC: Strauss)  Action details
Details 2015-349 25. CI - Commission Initiated Investigation** E999/CI-15-755 All Electric Utilities In the Matter of a Commission Inquiry into Fees Charged on Qualifying Facilities. Is it permissible under Minnesota statutes and rules to impose an additional monthly fee on a qualifying facility interconnected with a public utility? If an additional fee is permissible, what factors should the Commission consider in determining whether the fee or charge is reasonable? Should the Commission take any action on the specific fees charged by Minnesota Power, Otter Tail Power, and Xcel Energy? (PUC: Terwilliger, Rosier)  Action details