|
Details 2016-074
| 2 | 1. | | CN - Certificate of Need | * IP6964/CN-16-289 Nobles 2 Power Partners, LLC
In the Matter of the Application of Nobles 2 Power Partners, LLC for a Certificate of Need for the up to 260 MW Nobles 2 Wind Project and Associated Facilities in Nobles County, Minnesota.
1. Should the Commission accept the application as complete?
2. Should the Commission direct the use of the informal review process?
3. Should the Commission vary the time limits of its rules that relate to application completeness and date of the information/ER scoping meeting? (PUC: Kaluzniak) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2017-245
| 1 | 2. | | WS - Wind Power Plant Siting | * IP6961/WS-17-597 Nobles 2 Power Partners, LLC
In the Matter of the Application of Nobles 2 Power Partners, LLC for a Site Permit for the up to 260 MW Nobles 2 Wind Project and Associated Facilities in Nobles County, Minnesota.
1. Should the Commission issue a preliminary draft site permit for the Nobles 2 Wind Project?
2. Should the Commission refer the matter to the OAH for a contested case hearing? (PUC: Kaluzniak) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2017-243
| 1 | 3. | | M - Miscellaneous | * G004/M-17-625 Great Plains Natural Gas Co.
In the Matter of the Petition of Great Plains Natural Gas Co. for Approval of Proposed Revisions to its Natural Gas Tariff to Comply with Federal Pipeline Safety Regulations 49 CFR Part 192.383. (PUC: Bonnett; DOC: Ouanes) | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2017-173
| 2 | 4. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** E015/M-16-564; Minnesota Power
E015/GR-16-664
In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s Revised Petition for a Competitive Rate for Energy-Intensive Trade-Exposed (EITE) Customers and an EITE Cost Recovery Rider;
In the Matter of the Application of Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in Minnesota.
1. Should the Commission reconsider or reopen its Cost Recovery Orders?
2. If so, should the Cost Recovery Orders be modified? (PUC: O’Grady)
The commission shall decide a petition for rehearing, amendment, vacation, reconsideration, or reargument with or without a hearing or oral argument. The commission may vacate or stay the order, or part of the order, that is the subject of the petition, pending action on the petition. [Minn. Rules 7829.3000, subp. 6] | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2017-244
| 1 | 5. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** E002/M-17-425 Xcel Energy
In the Matter of a Petition by Xcel Energy for Approval of Solar Energy Standard Customer Exclusion Cost Treatment.
Should the Commission approve Xcel’s request for a method to exclude Solar Energy Standard (SES) exempt customers from SES-related costs in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 216B.1691, subd. 2f(f)? (PUC: Mackenzie) | |
Action details
|