Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
Meeting Name: PUC Agenda Meeting Agenda status: Final
Meeting date/time: 5/24/2018 9:30 AM  
Meeting location: Large Hearing Room
Published agenda: Agenda Decisions Agenda Decisions Published minutes: Not available  
Meeting video:  
Attachments:
File #Ver.Agenda #NameTypeTitleActionAction Details
Details 2018-038 31. CI - Commission Initiated Investigation* P407,405/CI-18-122 Frontier Communications In the Matter of a Commission Inquiry into the Service Quality, Customer Service, and Billing Practices of Frontier Communications. 1. What action, if any, should the Commission order in response to Frontier’s failure to timely notify its electronically billed customers of the public hearings scheduled in this matter? 2. Should the Commission order other action in this matter at this time? (PUC: McCarthy)  Action details
Details 2018-090 12. M - Miscellaneous* P431/AM-17-835; West Central Telephone; P409/M-17-837; Garden Valley Telephone Cooperative; P530/M-17-838; Halstad Telephone Company; P432/M-17-854 Paul Bunyan Telephone Cooperative In the Matter of Petitions for Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC) Designation in Minnesota. 1. Should the Commission approve the requests for ETC designation in Minnesota for purposes of providing local services under the Lifeline program? 2. Should the Commission refer questions regarding service availability, excess construction costs, and reporting to be addressed in Docket P999/CI-17-509? (PUC: McCarthy)  Action details
Details 2018-089 13. CI - Commission Initiated Investigation** E999/CI-16-521 All Electric Utilities In the Matter of Updating the Generic Standards of the Interconnection and Operation of Distributed Generation Facilities Established under Minn. Stat. §216B.16111. 1. Should the Commission approve, modify, or reject the staff recommendations based on the Distributed Generation Workgroup process for the statewide interconnection process and interconnection agreement; including the update to reporting requirements? 2. If approved, how should Minnesota utilities transition from the existing interconnection standards to the updated Minnesota Distributed Energy Resource Interconnection Process and Agreement? (PUC: Rosier, Terwilliger, Mackenzie)  Action details