Details 2018-206
| 1 | 1. | | M - Miscellaneous | * E002/M-17-26 Xcel Energy;
Woodstock Hills, LLC
In the Matter of An updated Petition for Approval of a Second Amendment to a Power Purchase Agreement with Woodstock Hills, LLC for a 9.2 MW Wind Generation Project. (PUC: Stalpes, Martone; DOC: O’Connell) | |
Action details
|
Details 2018-207
| 1 | 2. | | CI - Commission Initiated Investigation | * P999/CI-18-382 All Minnesota Telephone Companies and
Telecommunications Carriers
In the Matter of a Commission Inquiry to Examine Streamlining Procedures for Consent Dockets.
1. Are the proposed rule variances reasonable?
2. How long should the rules be varied?
3. How should service area and 911 dockets be treated? (PUC: Fournier) | |
Action details
|
Details 2018-038
| 3 | 3. | | CI - Commission Initiated Investigation | ** P407,405/CI-18-122 Frontier Communications of Minnesota, Inc.;
Citizens Telecommunications of MN LLC
In the Matter of a Commission Inquiry into the Service Quality, Customer Service, and Billing Practices of Frontier Communications.
1. Should the Commission approve the settlement filed by the Department of Commerce and Frontier?
2. Should the Commission take any other action? (PUC: Rebholz) | |
Action details
|
Details 2018-191
| 2 | 4. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** E017/M-18-119 Otter Tail Power Company
In the Matter of Otter Tail Power Company’s 2018 Conservation Cost Recovery Adjustment and 2017 Electric Demand Side Management Financial Incentive.
1. What December 31, 2017 tracker account balance should be approved by the Commission?
2. What level of Shared Savings financial incentive should the Commission approve for Otter Tail’s 2017 CIP achievements?
3. Should the Commission approve a 2018/2019 Conservation Cost Recovery Adjustment (CCRA) of $0.00600/kWh for bills rendered on and after October 1, 2018?
4. Should the Commission approve the request for a variance to Minnesota Rule 7820.3500 (K) to allow Otter Tail to continue to combine the Fuel Clause Adjustment (FCA) with the Conservation Improvement Adjustment on customer bills? And
5. Should the Commission require Otter Tail to submit a compliance filing, within 10 days of the issue date of the Order in the present docket, with revised tariff sheets reflecting the Commission’s determinations in this matter? (PUC: Fournier) | |
Action details
|
Details 2018-204
| 1 | 5. | | M - Miscellaneous | * IP6964/CN-16-289 Nobles 2 Power Partners, LLC
In the Matter of the Application of Nobles 2 Power Partners, LLC for a Certificate of Need for the up to 260 MW Nobles 2 Wind Project and Associated Facilities in Nobles County, Minnesota.
1. Should the Commission find that the environmental report and the record created in this matter adequately address the issues identified in the environmental report scoping decision?
2. Should the Commission grant a certificate of need for the up to 260 megawatt Nobles 2 Wind Project in Nobles County, Minnesota? (PUC: Kaluzniak) | |
Action details
|
Details 2018-205
| 1 | 6. | | M - Miscellaneous | * IP6964/WS-17-597 Nobles 2 Power Partners, LLC
In the Matter of the Application of Nobles 2 Power Partners, LLC for a Site Permit for the up to 260 MW Nobles 2 Wind Project and Associated Facilities in Nobles County, Minnesota.
1. Should the Commission adopt the administrative law judge’s Summary of Public Testimony, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation?
2. Should the Commission grant a site permit for the up to 260 megawatt Nobles 2 Wind Farm proposed in Nobles County, Minnesota? (PUC: Kaluzniak) | |
Action details
|