Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
Meeting Name: PUC Agenda Meeting Agenda status: Final
Meeting date/time: 6/4/2020 9:15 AM  
Meeting location: Online via WebEx
Published agenda: Agenda Decisions Agenda Decisions Published minutes: Not available  
Meeting video:  
Attachments:
File #Ver.Agenda #NameTypeTitleActionAction Details
Details 2020-079 11. WS - Wind Power Plant Siting* IP6557/WS-06-91 FPL Energy Mower County Wind, LLC In the Matter of a Site Permit Amendment to Repower the 98.9 Megawatt Mower County Wind Energy Center Wind Project and Associated Facilities in Mower County, Minnesota. Should the Commission grant the site permit amendments as requested? (PUC: Panait)  Action details
Details 2020-081 12. M - Miscellaneous* E002/M-20-437; Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy E002/AA-19-293 In the Matter of Northern States Power Company’s Proposal to Adjust the 2020 Fuel Forecast Monthly Fuel Cost Charges. Should the Commission approve Xcel’s request to lower FCA rates during the months of June, July and August 2020? (PUC: Alonso, Bender, Bonnett)  Action details
Details 2020-043 13. D - DepreciationPULLED ** E017/D-19-547 Otter Tail Power Company In the Matter of Otter Tail Power Company’s Petition for Approval of its 2019 Annual Review of Depreciation Certification. 1. Should the Commission approve the proposed depreciation parameters and the resulting rates for Otter Tail Power Company’s annual depreciation update? 2. Should the proposed remaining lives of Hoot Lake Production Plant Units 2 & 3 and Hydraulic Production Plant be reduced by one year to better match depreciation accruals to plant retirement? (PUC: Hetherington)  Action details
Details 2020-080 14. GR - General Rate** E015/GR-19-442; Minnesota Power E015/M-20-429; E015/M-16-564 In the Matter of the Application of Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Electric Service Rates in Minnesota; In the Matter of the Emergency Petition of Minnesota Power for Approval to Move Asset-Based Wholesale Sales Credits to the Fuel Adjustment Clause and Resolve Rate Case; In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s Revised Petition for a Competitive Rate for Energy-Intensive Trade-Exposed (EITE) Customers and an EITE Cost Recovery Rider. 1. Should the Commission approve Minnesota Power's request to shift recovery of the Company's energy and capacity asset-based wholesale sales margins from base rates to its Fuel Adjustment Clause (FAC or FCA)? 2. Should the Commission approve Minnesota Power’s requested mid-year change to its currently approved 2020 FCA? 3. Should the Commission authorize Minnesota Power to change base rates, as requested, as a result of this docket rather than in the rate case? 4. Should the Commission approve Minnesota Power’s proposal to defer residential rate design issues in the r  Action details