Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
Meeting Name: PUC Agenda Meeting Agenda status: Final
Meeting date/time: 7/22/2021 9:15 AM  
Meeting location: Online via Webex
Published agenda: Decisions Decisions Published minutes: Not available  
Meeting video:  
Attachments:
File #Ver.Agenda #NameTypeTitleActionAction Details
Details 2021-145 11. M - Miscellaneous* E111/M-21-45 Dakota Electric Association In the Matter of the Petition by Dakota Electric Association for Approval of Monthly Fixed Charges per Meter for the Advanced Grid Infrastructure (AGi) Rider. Should the Commission approve Dakota Electric Association’s 2021 AGi Rider Monthly Fixed Charge per Meter amounts for various rate classes? (PUC: McShane)  Action details
Details 2021-161 12. M - Miscellaneous** P421/M-21-381 CenturyLink QC In the Matter of a Petition for a Rulemaking Regarding Minnesota Rules Chapter 7810. Should the Commission open a Rulemaking proceeding to modify or eliminate portions of Minnesota’s Telephone Quality of Service Rules? (PUC: O’Grady)  Action details
Details 2021-146 13. WS - Wind Power Plant Siting* IP6646/WS-09-584 Xcel Energy In the Matter of Site Permit Amendment Application for Proposed Upgrades to Xcel Energy’s Nobles Wind Farm in Nobles County, Minnesota. Should the Commission approve the requested amendments to the Nobles Wind Farm LWECS site permit? (PUC: Bruce)  Action details
Details 2019-219 34. CN - Certificate of Need** IP6997/CN-18-699; Plum Creek Wind Farm, LLC IP6997/WS-18-700; IP6997/TL-18-701 In the Matter of the Applications of Plum Creek Wind Farm, LLC for a Certificate of Need, Site Permit, and Route Permit for an up to 414 MW Large Wind Energy Conversion System and 345 kV Transmission Line in Cottonwood, Murray, and Redwood Counties, Minnesota. 1. Should the Commission find that the environmental impact statement is adequate? 2. Should the Commission adopt the administrative law judge’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation? 3. Should the Commission grant a certificate of need for the 414-megawatt Plum Creek large wind energy conversion system and associated 345-kilovolt high-voltage transmission line? 4. Should the Commission issue a site permit for the 414-megawatt Plum Creek large wind energy conversion system? 5. Should the Commission issue a route permit for the associated 345-kilovolt high-voltage transmission line? (PUC: Ek)  Action details