|
Details 2021-213
| 1 | 1. | | M - Miscellaneous | ** PT5817/RW-21-268 Connexus Energy
In the Matter of a Petition of Connexus Energy for Resolution of a Dispute with BNSF Railway Company Regarding Fees and Additional Requirements Under Minnesota Statutes Section 237.045.
Should the Commission reconsider its October 5, 2021 Order Resolving Dispute and Authorizing Commencement of Construction?(PUC: Kaluzniak)
The Commission has the authority to accept or decline a petition for reconsideration with or without a hearing or oral argument (Minnesota Rules 7829.3000, Subpart 6) In other words, a decision on a petition for reconsideration can be made without taking oral comments at the Commission meeting. | |
Action details
|
|
Details 2021-210
| 1 | 2. | | TL - Transmission Line | ** ET2/TL-21-434 Nexus Line, LLC
In the Matter of the Petition to Transfer a Portion of the Route Permit for the HVDC Transmission Line System and Associated Facilities in Minnesota.
1. Has Nexus met the requirements of Order point 9 in the Commission’s March 3 Order? If not, what requirements were not met?
2. Do the financial statements and other financial information provided by Nexus in its May 3, 2023 Petition demonstrate that the permittee has the ability to fund the decommissioning financial assurance? If not, what additional information should the Commission require Nexus to provide to demonstrate the permittee can fund the decommissioning financial assurance?
3. Do the proposed terms of the guaranty provide sufficient protections to ensure Minnesota ratepayers will not have to fund decommissioning of the high-voltage transmission line? If not, what changes should be made?
4. With the proposed guaranty, how will the public interest be protected in the event of the bankruptcy of the guarantor?
5. Is it in the public interest to switch from a letter of credit to a parental guar | |
Action details
|