Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
Meeting Name: PUC Agenda Meeting Agenda status: Final
Meeting date/time: 9/1/2022 10:00 AM  
Meeting location:
Published agenda: Agenda Agenda Published minutes: Not available  
Meeting video:  
Attachments:
File #Ver.Agenda #NameTypeTitleActionAction Details
Details 2022-160 11. M - Miscellaneous** E002/M-21-794 Northern States Power Company, d/b/a Xcel Energy In the Matter of Northern States Power Company, d/b/a Xcel Energy’s Petition for Approval of the Renewable Energy Standard (RES) Rider Revenue Requirements for 2022 and Revised Adjustment Factors. 1. Should the Commission approve or modify Xcel Energy’s 2022 RES rider revenue requirement and its accompanying revised RES adjustment factor? 2. Should Xcel be allowed to recalculate the factor in compliance? 3. Should the Commission approve RES rider eligibility for five wind repower projects? (PUC: Gustafson)  Action details
Details 2022-154 12. C - Complaint** P5903,432,560,567, Christensen Communication Company; 422,539,537,545,527, Johnson Telephone Company; 5446/C-22-245 KMTelecom; Park Region Telephone Charitable Trust, Inc., d/b/a Park Region Telephone Co.; Valley Telephone Company; Rothsay Telephone Company, Inc; Otter Tail Telecom, LLC; Wikstrom Telephone Company, Incorporated; Gardenville Cooperative Telephone Association; Bevcomm Inc. In the Matter of a Formal Complaint and Request for Expedited Relief Initiated by the Minnesota Department of Public Safety (DPS) Regarding the Delivery and the Compensation Related to the 911 Network by Christensen Communications Company, Johnson Telephone Company, KMTelecom, Park Region Telephone Co., Valley Telephone Company, Rothsay Telephone Company, Otter Tail Telecom, LLC, Wikstrom Telephone Company, Gardenville Cooperative Telephone Association, and Bevcomm Inc. Should the Commission open an investigation of the matters alleged in the DPS complaint? (PUC: Fournier, McShane)  Action details
Details 2022-156 13. M - Miscellaneous** E015/M-21-390 Minnesota Power In the Matter of the 2021 Integrated Distribution Plan. 1. Should the Commission accept or reject Minnesota Power’s Integrated Distribution Plan (IDP)? 2. Should the Commission adjust any of the IDP filing requirements for Minnesota Power’s next IDP? (PUC: McShane)  Action details
Details 2022-158 14. M - Miscellaneous* E111/M-21-728 Dakota Electric Association In the Matter of Distribution System Planning for Dakota Electric Association. 1. What action should the Commission take with Dakota Electric Association’s 2021 Integrated Distribution Plan (IDP)? 2. Should the Commission adjust any of the IDP filing requirements for Dakota Electric Association’s next IDP? (PUC: Duran)  Action details
Details 2022-159 15. M - Miscellaneous** E017/M-21-612 Otter Tail Power Company In the Matter of Distribution System Planning for Otter Tail Power Company. 1. Should the Commission accept or reject Otter Tail Power’s Integrated Distribution Plan (IDP)? 2. Does the IDP filed by Otter Tail Power achieve the planning objectives outlined in the filing requirements as amended by the Commission’s November 2, 2020 Order? 3. What IDP filing requirements provide the most value to the process, and why? 4. Are there filing requirements that are not informative and/or should be deleted or modified, and why? 5. Are there other issues or concerns related to this matter? (PUC: Noyce)  Action details
Details 2022-157 16. M - Miscellaneous** E002/M-21-694; Xcel Energy; E015/M-21-390; Minnesota Power; E017/M-21-612; Otter Tail Power Company; E111/M-21-728 Dakota Electric Association In the Matter of Xcel Energy’s 2021 Integrated Distribution System Plan; In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s 2021 Integrated Distribution System Plan; In the Matter of Distribution System Planning for Otter Tail Power Company; In the Matter of Distribution System Planning for Dakota Electric Association. 1. What action should the Commission take on the Department of Commerce’s Guidance Document as it relates to future IDPs and grid modernization filings? 2. Should the Commission require utilities to file additional information under Filing Requirement 3.D? 3. Should the Commission clarify its intent regarding Filing Requirement 3.A.28? (PUC: Terwilliger)  Action details
Details 2022-138 17. M - Miscellaneous* E002/M-21-767 Xcel Energy In the Matter of Xcel Energy 2021 Hosting Capacity Report Under Minn. Stat. 216B.2425, Subd. 8. Should the Commission accept or reject Xcel Energy’s 2021 Hosting Capacity Analysis Report? (PUC: Terwilliger)  Action details