Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
Meeting Name: PUC Agenda Meeting Agenda status: Final
Meeting date/time: 9/15/2022 10:00 AM  
Meeting location:
Published agenda: Agenda Agenda Published minutes: Not available  
Meeting video:  
File #Ver.Agenda #NameTypeTitleActionAction Details
Details 2022-179 11. SA - Service Area* E309,124/SA-22-281 Shakopee Public Utilities Commission; Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative In the Matter of the Joint Petition for Approval of a Permanent Service Territory Transfer Between Shakopee Public Utilities Commission and Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative. (PUC: Noyce; DOC: Cullen)  Action details
Details 2022-178 12. M - Miscellaneous* E015/M-11-409 Minnesota Power In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s Petition for Approval of a Rider for Customer Affordability of Residential Electricity (CARE). Should the Commission accept Minnesota Power’s Request to Modify its Customer Affordability Residential Electricity (CARE) Program? (PUC: McShane; DOC: Smetana)  Action details
Details 2022-172 13. M - Miscellaneous* G004/M-22-217 Great Plains Natural Gas Company In the Matter of Great Plains Natural Gas Company’s 2021 Conservation Improvement Program Tracker and Shared Savings Demand Side Management Incentive. (PUC: Dornfeld; DOC: Skayer, Winner)  Action details
Details 2022-173 14. M - Miscellaneous* G008/M-22-215 CenterPoint Energy In the Matter of CenterPoint Energy’s 2021 Conservation Improvement Program Status Report, 2021 Demand Side Management Financial Incentive, Conservation Improvement Program Tracker Report, and 2021 Conservation Cost Recovery Adjustment Aggregated Compliance Filing. (PUC: Dornfeld; DOC: Skayer, Winner)  Action details
Details 2021-100 25. M - Miscellaneous** E002/M-20-891 Northern States Power Company, d/b/a Xcel Energy In the Matter of Xcel Energy’s Sherco Solar Project. 1. Should the Commission approve Xcel Energy’s acquisition and construction of the 460 MW Sherco Solar Project, subject to conditions? 2. Should the Commission authorize the Company to recover costs of the Project through the RES Rider? 3. Should the Commission determine that any future cost recovery is limited to the Minnesota jurisdictional allocators approved by the Commission? (PUC: Stalpes, Duran, Mezic)  Action details