Legislation Details

File #: Details 2015-274    Version: Name:
Type: TL - Transmission Line Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 9/10/2015 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 7/29/2016 Final action:
Title: ** ET2/TL-15-423 Great River Energy In the Matter of the Application of Great River Energy for a Route Permit under the Alternative Permitting Process for the Palisade 115 kV Project near the city of Palisade, Minnesota. * Should the Commission issue findings of fact and conclusions demonstrating that the alternative permitting process has been conducted in accordance with Minn. Stat. ? 216E.04 and Minn. R. 7850.2800 to 7850.3900? * Should the Commission find that the environmental assessment and the record created at the public hearing adequately address the issues identified in the scoping decision? * Should the Commission grant a route permit for the Palisade 115 kV Transmission Line Project? * Should the Commission require specific conditions if the route permit is granted? (PUC: Kaluzniak)
Attachments: 1. Notice of Intent to File Application 5-4-15, 2. GRE Initial Filing pt 1 of 6 08-25-2015, 3. GRE Initial Filing pt 2 of 6 08-25-2015, 4. GRE Initial Filing pt 3 of 6 08-25-2015, 5. GRE Initial Filing pt 4 of 6 08-25-2015, 6. GRE Initial Filing pt 5 of 6 08-25-2015, 7. GRE Initial Filing pt 6 of 6 08-25-2015, 8. DOC EERA EA Scoping Decision 12-22-15, 9. DOC EERA Additional Landowner Notification 2-19-16, 10. DOC EERA Alternate Route Landowner Notification 2-23-16, 11. DOC EERA Environmental Assessment Report-all pts 4-21-16, 12. MN DNR Comments-all pts 5-16-16, 13. GRE Proposed Findings of Fact 5-24-16, 14. GRE Comments on the Draft Route Permit 5-26-16, 15. ALJ Summary of Public Testimony 6-17-16, 16. DOC EERA Proposed Finding Of Fact 6-30-16, 17. Briefing Papers, 18. Revised Decision Options

title

**                     ET2/TL-15-423                     Great River Energy

In the Matter of the Application of Great River Energy for a Route Permit under the Alternative Permitting Process for the Palisade 115 kV Project near the city of Palisade, Minnesota.

 

•                     Should the Commission issue findings of fact and conclusions demonstrating that the alternative permitting process has been conducted in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 216E.04 and Minn. R. 7850.2800 to 7850.3900?

•                     Should the Commission find that the environmental assessment and the record created at the public hearing adequately address the issues identified in the scoping decision?

•                     Should the Commission grant a route permit for the Palisade 115 kV Transmission Line Project?

•                     Should the Commission require specific conditions if the route permit is granted? (PUC: Kaluzniak)