Skip to main content
File #: Details 2025-258    Version: 1 Name:
Type: M - Miscellaneous Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 11/19/2025 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 12/11/2025 Final action:
Title: ** G002/M-25-403 Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy In the Matter of the Application of Xcel Energy's Petition for Approval of Gas State Energy Policy Rider Recovery with True-Up Mechanisms. 1. Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposed SEP Rider Recovery to establish baseline for $46.3 million effective January 1, 2026, subject to true-up to actual 2026 expenses? 2. Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposed Capital True-up for 2026 through the existing SEP Rider? 3. Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposed Property Tax True-up for 2026 through the existing SEP Rider? 4. Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposed Labor Cost Recovery for 2026 through the existing SEP Rider? 5. Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposed Damage Prevention Recovery for 2026 through the existing SEP Rider? 6. Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposed Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) Costs for 2026 through the existing SEP rider? 7. Should the Commission approve Xcel's reques...
Attachments: 1. Xcel Initial Filing 10-31-25, 2. DOC Comments 11-12-25, 3. CUB Comments 11-12-25, 4. OAG Comments 11-12-25, 5. Xcel Reply Comments 11-17-25, 6. LIUNA Reply Comments 11-18-25, 7. Briefing Papers
Date Ver.Action ByActionAction DetailsMeeting Details
No records to display.

title

**                     G002/M-25-403                     Northern States Power Co. d/b/a Xcel Energy

In the Matter of the Application of Xcel Energy’s Petition for Approval of Gas State Energy Policy Rider Recovery with True-Up Mechanisms.

 

1.                     Should the Commission approve Xcel’s proposed SEP Rider Recovery to establish baseline for $46.3 million effective January 1, 2026, subject to true-up to actual 2026 expenses?

2.                     Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposed Capital True-up for 2026 through the existing SEP Rider?

3.                     Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposed Property Tax True-up for 2026 through the existing SEP Rider?

4.                     Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposed Labor Cost Recovery for 2026 through the existing SEP Rider?

5.                     Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposed Damage Prevention Recovery for 2026 through the existing SEP Rider?

6.                     Should the Commission approve Xcel's proposed Manufactured Gas Plant (MGP) Costs for 2026 through the existing SEP rider?

7.                     Should the Commission approve Xcel’s request to leave its base rates unchanged in 2026 and to withdraw its application for a general rate increase in Docket No. G-002/GR-25-356? (PUC: Pham, Andringa)