Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: Details 2015-150    Version: Name:
Type: PPL - Petroleum Pipeline Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 6/10/2015 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 6/25/2020 Final action:
Title: ** PL9/PPL-15-137 Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership In the Matter of the Application of Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership for a Routing Permit for the Proposed Line 3 Replacement Project in Minnesota from the North Dakota Border to the Wisconsin Border 1. What action should the Commission take on Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership's May 5, 2020 Application for Approval of Route Width Variations and Permit Amendment? 2. Should the Commission change certain conditions in the Pipeline Routing Permit to improve the efficiency of the public safety liaison process? (PUC: Ek)
Attachments: 1. 2019-05-03 - Original Enbridge Route Permit Amendment Application, 2. 2019-05-31 - DOC EERA Comments on Original Application, 3. 2019-05-31 - FOH Comments on Original Application, 4. 2019-06-03 - Public Comment Suonvieri on Original Application, 5. 2019-06-07 - Enbridge Reply Comments on Original Application, 6. 2019-06-07 - Enbridge Response to PUC IR on Original Application, 7. PUC - Reissued Order 10-26-2018 - 5-1-2020, 8. PUC - Reissued Order 1-18-2020- 5-1-2020, 9. Endbridge - Application - 05-05-2020, 10. 2020-06-05 - EERA Comments on Reissued Application, 11. 2020-06-05 - MNDPS Letter to the PUC - dated 05-28-2020, 12. 2020-06-17 - Public Comment Suonvieri on 5-5-20 Application, 13. Briefing Papers

title

**                     PL9/PPL-15-137                     Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership

In the Matter of the Application of Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership for a Routing Permit for the Proposed Line 3 Replacement Project in Minnesota from the North Dakota Border to the Wisconsin Border

 

1.                     What action should the Commission take on Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership’s May 5, 2020 Application for Approval of Route Width Variations and Permit Amendment?

2.                     Should the Commission change certain conditions in the Pipeline Routing Permit to improve the efficiency of the public safety liaison process? (PUC: Ek)