File #: Details 2016-091    Version: 1 Name:
Type: TL - Transmission Line Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 5/18/2016 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 6/2/2016 Final action:
Title: ** E015/TL-14-21 Minnesota Power In the Matter of the Application of Minnesota Power for a Route Permit for the Great Northern Transmission Line Project in Roseau, Lake of the Woods, Beltrami, Koochiching and Itasca Counties. Should the Commission reconsider its April 11, 2016 Order Issuing Route Permit with Modifications? (PUC: Kaluzniak) The Commission has the authority to accept or decline a petition for reconsideration with or without a hearing or oral argument. (Minnesota Rules 7829.3000, Subpart 6) In other words, a decision on a petition for reconsideration can be made without taking oral comments at the Commission meeting.
Attachments: 1. Order Issuing Route Permit pt 1 of 3 4-11-16, 2. Order Issuing Route Permit pt 2 of 3 4-11-16, 3. Order Issuing Route Permit pt 3 of 3 4-11-16, 4. Peterson Petition for Reconsideration 4-28-16, 5. McBee Petition for Reconsideration 5-2-16, 6. MP Response to Petitions 5-9-16, 7. MP MISO Letter 5-16-16, 8. Briefing Papers, 9. Revised Decision Alternatives
Related files: Details 2014-151

title

**                     E015/TL-14-21                     Minnesota Power

In the Matter of the Application of Minnesota Power for a Route Permit for the Great Northern Transmission Line Project in Roseau, Lake of the Woods, Beltrami, Koochiching and Itasca Counties.

 

Should the Commission reconsider its April 11, 2016 Order Issuing Route Permit with Modifications? (PUC: Kaluzniak)

 

The Commission has the authority to accept or decline a petition for reconsideration with or without a hearing or oral argument.  (Minnesota Rules 7829.3000, Subpart 6)  In other words, a decision on a petition for reconsideration can be made without taking oral comments at the Commission meeting.