Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: Details 2014-057    Version: Name:
Type: M - Miscellaneous Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 3/5/2014 In control: PUC Agenda Meeting
On agenda: 3/12/2014 Final action:
Title: ** E999/M-14-65 All Rate Regulated Electric Utilities In the Matter of Establishing a Distributed Solar Value Methodology under Minn. Stat. ?216B.164, subd. 10 (e) and (f). Should the Commission reconsider its April 1, 2014 Order? (PUC: Rebholz, Mackenzie) The Commission has the authority to accept or decline a petition for reconsideration with or without a hearing or oral argument. (Minnesota Rules 7829.3000, Subpart 6) In other words, a decision on a petition for reconsideration can be made without taking oral comments at the Commission meeting. If you have questions about this particular docket, please contact Susan Mackenzie at 651-201-2241.
Attachments: 1. DOC Value of Solar 1-31-14, 2. PUC Order 4-1-14, 3. DOC Value of Solar Methodology 1-31-14, 4. Xcel Request for Reconsideration 4-21-14, 5. Minnesota Power Initial Comments 2-13-14, 6. MnSEIA Answer 4-29-14, 7. Xcel Energy Initial Comments 2-13-14, 8. MP Answer 4-30-14, 9. Alliance for Solar Choice Initial Comments 2-13-14, 10. OTP Answer 5-1-14, 11. Environmental Law and Policy Center et al Initial Comments 2-13-14, 12. Fresh Energy et al Answer 5-1-14, 13. Minnesota Rural Electric Association Initial Comments 2-13-14, 14. DOC Answer 5-1-14, 15. MN Solar Energy Industries Association Initial Comments 2-13-14, 16. MREA Answer 5-1-14, 17. Union of Concerned Scientists Reply Comments 2-19-14, 18. PUC Briefing Papers, 19. Solar Energy Industries Association Comments 2-19-14, 20. Minnesota Renewable Energy Society Reply Comments 2-20-14, 21. Solar Energy Industries Association Reply Comments 2-20-14, 22. Xcel Energy Reply Comments 2-20-14, 23. Environmental Law and Policy Center et al Reply Comments 2-20-14, 24. Minnesota Power Reply Comments 2-20-14, 25. Alliance for Solar Choice Reply Comments 2-20-14, 26. Otter Tail Power Company Reply Comments 2-20-14, 27. DOC Reply Comments 2-20-14, 28. Cooperative Network Comments 2-21-14, 29. Center for Resource Solutions Comments 2-24-14, 30. PUC Briefing Papers 3-5-14, 31. DOC comments supp 3-11-14, 32. PUC Revised Decision Options 3-12-14
title
**      E999/M-14-65      All Rate Regulated Electric Utilities
In the Matter of Establishing a Distributed Solar Value Methodology under Minn. Stat. §216B.164, subd. 10 (e) and (f).
 
Should the Commission reconsider its April 1, 2014 Order? (PUC: Rebholz, Mackenzie)
 
The Commission has the authority to accept or decline a petition for reconsideration with or without a hearing or oral argument.  (Minnesota Rules 7829.3000, Subpart 6)  In other words, a decision on a petition for reconsideration can be made without taking oral comments at the Commission meeting.  If you have questions about this particular docket, please contact Susan Mackenzie at 651-201-2241.